Lithium: global demand forecasts?
…electronics, grid-scale batteries and conventional material uses. $499.00 – Purchase Checkout Added to cart Demand for lithium has already trebled from 23kTpa in 2010 to 65kTpa in 2020, while we see the…
…electronics, grid-scale batteries and conventional material uses. $499.00 – Purchase Checkout Added to cart Demand for lithium has already trebled from 23kTpa in 2010 to 65kTpa in 2020, while we see the…
…note the importance of policy and the challenge of achieving large-scale production. The GTL process is modeled on pages 6-10. We focus on the costs, economics, CO2 intensities and liquid…
…invested in wind and solar, in order to add the same amount of primary energy to the global energy system (chart below, note here). Economies of scale are visible in…
…us create a new framework, which we will be using to assess new energy technologies, on a scale of 0-5. This matters for models of energy transition and for SPAC…
…away from smaller alkaline electrolyers in the hundreds of kW of capacity to super-giant PEMs, and SOECs, with overall project capacities potentially reaching GW-scale. Key controversies are visibly emerging around…
…methods. To be practical, the technology needs to be proven at scale, battery chemistries must stabilize and cheaper alternatives must be banned. Our 15-page note explores what it would take…
…possibly also biogas or hydrogen. Our build-up looks across five main categories: large power facilities, large industrial heating facilities, landfill gas, electric vehicle charging and smaller-scale commercial and multi-family usage….
…two-thirds of inverters, of which four are Chinese companies, such as Huawei and Sungrow, while we have also explored electronics from SolarEdge. Our utility-scale solar cost models assume $0.1/W inverter…
…intensity. This matters as fertilizer production thus explains over 1% of global CO2 emissions. $899.00 – Purchase Checkout Added to cart Ammonia production via the Haber-Bosch process was first demonstrated at scale…
…scale-up factors. The maths are horrible and precision is low. Are ‘verified’ offsets any better? We are not convinced that these elaborate rules necessarily confer much better precision, as explained…